State Feedback and Linear Quadratic Regulation
Stub. Designing a feedback gain to control a system's behavior: pole placement (choosing closed-loop eigenvalues directly, using controllability), and the linear quadratic regulator (LQR) — discrete-time finite-horizon LQR and its Lagrange-multiplier derivation, the infinite-horizon and continuous-time LQR, and linear quadratic stochastic control.
Corresponds to lectures: Pole placement by state feedback; Linear quadratic regulator: discrete-time finite horizon; LQR via Lagrange multipliers; Infinite horizon linear quadratic regulator; Continuous-time linear quadratic regulator; Linear quadratic stochastic control. Both halves of this note design a feedback law using controllability (controllability-observability-and-canonical-forms), but with different goals. Pole placement picks directly to put the closed-loop eigenvalues () wherever desired. LQR instead picks to minimize a quadratic cost trading off state deviation against control effort — derived first via Lagrange multipliers for the finite-horizon discrete-time case, then extended to the infinite-horizon and continuous- time cases (where the cost-to-go satisfies a Riccati equation), and finally to the stochastic case, where the optimal feedback law turns out to be the same as the noise-free case (certainty equivalence) — the fact that makes this note’s LQR pair naturally with estimation-and-the-kalman-filter‘s state estimation.
Outline (TODO — flesh out each)
- Pole placement by state feedback
- Linear quadratic regulator: discrete-time finite horizon
- LQR via Lagrange multipliers
- Infinite horizon LQR — the algebraic Riccati equation
- Continuous-time LQR
- Linear quadratic stochastic control — certainty equivalence